President Trump has recently ordered 2000 National Guard troops to be stationed in Los Angeles, California, to suppress street protests that erupted due to the federal crackdown on illegal immigration, raising constitutional concerns. Governor Newsom has strongly opposed this action, claiming it is unconstitutional and demanding the withdrawal of the troops and the return of command authority.

According to reports, Trump has invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code, asserting that the situation in Los Angeles constitutes a 'rebellion or threat of rebellion' against the government, justifying the federalization of the National Guard for riot control. Critics, however, question the political motives behind Trump's move, suggesting it aims to manipulate immigration issues to solidify his voter base.

In a letter to the Secretary of Defense, Newsom emphasized that this action is a 'serious violation of California's sovereignty' and called for the immediate withdrawal of troops, stating that there is currently no need for National Guard deployment in Los Angeles.

Moreover, during the protests, hundreds of demonstrators waved flags from Mexico and other Latin American countries to express dissatisfaction with immigration policies. This sparked condemnation from the White House National Security Advisor, who stated that 'foreigners waving foreign flags, creating chaos, and obstructing federal law enforcement is a threat to American sovereignty.' These remarks have prompted backlash from the academic community.

Human rights and legal organizations expressed shock at Trump's unilateral deployment of the National Guard, warning that it may symbolize an abuse of power. Legal scholars indicate that Trump's actions could face legal challenges at both federal and state levels, with the California government considering filing a lawsuit, alleging violations of the National Guard Act and the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution.